In the above video, I attempt to answer what most Catholics are missing on the coronavirus-19 vaccine discussion, namely: Is the vaccine necessary? Is the vaccine dangerous? Towards the end of the video I explain that there must be a motivation for so many agents of Church and State to roll-out a vaccine with so little discernment and so few medical trails before foisting it upon unsuspecting citizens. Of course, the number one issue for anyone involved in the courts, law-enforcement or international affairs has become: Motive, motive, motive.

So what is the motive to control society through a lockdown and a vaccine?  In 2015, the United Nations rolled out something they called The Sustainable Development Agenda and their mission statement for this is: “A blueprint to achieve a better and more sustainable future for all by 2030.”  The goals are: (1) No Poverty, (2) Zero Hunger, (3) Good Health and Well-being, (4) Quality Education, (5) Gender Equality, (6) Clean Water and Sanitation, (7) Affordable and Clean Energy, (8) Decent Work and Economic Growth, (9) Industry, Innovation and Infrastructure, (10) Reducing Inequality, (11) Sustainable Cities and Communities, (12) Responsible Consumption and Production, (13) Climate Action, (14) Life Below Water, (15) Life On Land, (16) Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions, (17) Partnerships for the Goals.

Most of the above goals do not—at first glance—seem to contract Catholic Social Teaching.  However, the Sustainable Development Agenda used to be known as Agenda 2030 and Agenda 21.  People like the Irishman Dave Cullen at the YouTube Channel Computing Forever studied Agenda 21’s hidden agendas before the UN could delete their plan.  Dave summarizes what he found as this that I took as a screenshot from his channel:

The first and the last of those should be of particular interest to the Catholic who has studied communism:  The abolition of private property and mandatory birth (population control.)  Thus, the United Nations, the World Health Organization, the World Economic Forum are the premier groups Europe expediting both “Sustainable Goals” and the urgent necessity of the coronavirus-19 vaccine.  However, as I explained in the above video, even the government of the United Kingdom has already said that the coronavirus-19 vaccine may have adverse effects upon a woman’s fertility.  The UK government release says on page six: “For women of childbearing age,  pregnancy should be excluded before vaccination.”

It shouldn’t take a conspiracy theorist to link the birth control intention of Agenda 21 in the first screenshot above to the fact the coronavirus vaccine is now publicly recognized as a possible threat to women’s fertility.

But still, why don’t we hear much about Agenda 21 right now?  Dave Cullen answers this:

The same groups pushing the vaccine, lockdown and masks are the same groups pushing for a Universal Basic Income and this ties into the first goal of Agenda 21, namely, the abolition of private property.  Remember, here the obvious, that the hallmark of communism is the abolition of private-property, control of the citizens and usually massive attempts at sterilization and birth control.  Remember also that communism is the political system that killed 100M people in the 20th century.

We would never lose our private-property in the United States, though, right…?

The plan is for the elite to live rural and for the rabble to live in the control of smart cities.  In fact, the World Economic Forum has a blog post called Here’s how life could change in my city by 2030 and the opening line is, not kidding:   Welcome to the year 2030. Welcome to my city – or should I say, “our city”. I don’t own anything. I don’t own a car. I don’t own a house. I don’t own any appliances or any clothes.

The rest of the fictional blog post continues like a dystopian movie, but in fact, it is a fictional letter written from those in 2030 to the naysayers in 2020 who might reject not their dystopian worldview but their utopian world view.  This fictional letter laments a few freethinkers who have rejected a world of no private property.  This fictional letter laments the few freethinkers who have been ominously been “lost on the way” by choosing to live rural lifestyles instead of the communist-control of what the WEF admits they wish to call “smart cities.”  This letter is fictional, but the WEF is very real in their planning of this:

“My biggest concern is all the people who do not live in our city. Those we lost on the way. Those who decided that it became too much, all this technology. Those who felt obsolete and useless when robots and AI took over big parts of our jobs. Those who got upset with the political system and turned against it. They live different kind of lives outside of the city. Some have formed little self-supplying communities. Others just stayed in the empty and abandoned houses in small 19th century villages.

“Once in awhile I get annoyed about the fact that I have no real privacy. No where I can go and not be registered. I know that, somewhere, everything I do, think and dream of is recorded. I just hope that nobody will use it against me.

“All in all, it is a good life. Much better than the path we were on, where it became so clear that we could not continue with the same model of growth. We had all these terrible things happening: lifestyle diseases, climate change, the refugee crisis, environmental degradation, completely congested cities, water pollution, air pollution, social unrest and unemployment. We lost way too many people before we realised that we could do things differently.